نعومة دالة

(تم التحويل من Smoothness)
A bump function is a smooth function with compact support.

In mathematical analysis, the smoothness of a function or map describes the extent to which it has derivatives that exist and vary continuously.[1]

Given a non-negative integer k, a function of class Ck is a function whose derivatives of all orders up to k exist and are continuous over the function's domain.

A function of class C is a function that is of class Ck for every non-negative integer k.

Generally, the term smooth function refers to a C-function. However, it may also mean "sufficiently differentiable" for the problem under consideration.

For complex-valued functions, one may still speak of Ck or C smoothness by regarding the function as a map between real vector spaces. This should be distinguished from complex differentiability: a complex function that is complex differentiable on an open subset of is holomorphic and hence analytic on that set.

Differentiability classes

Differentiability class is a classification of functions according to the properties of their derivatives. It is a measure of the highest order of derivative that exists and is continuous for a function.

Consider an open set U on the real line and a function f defined on U with real values. Let k be a non-negative integer. The function f is said to be of differentiability class Ck if the derivatives f,f,,f(k) exist and are continuous on U. If f is of class Ck on U and k>0, then it is also of class Ck1. The function f is said to be infinitely differentiable, smooth, or of class C, if it is of class Ck for every non-negative integer k.[2] The function f is said to be of class Cω, or analytic, if f is smooth and its Taylor series expansion around any point in its domain converges to the function in some neighborhood of the point. There exist functions that are smooth but not analytic; Cω is thus strictly contained in C. Bump functions are examples of functions with this property.

To put it differently, the class C0 consists of all continuous functions. The class C1 consists of all differentiable functions whose derivative is continuous; such functions are called continuously differentiable. Thus, a C1 function is exactly a function whose derivative exists and is of class C0. For functions of one real variable, the classes Ck can be defined recursively by declaring C0 to be the set of all continuous functions, and declaring Ck for any positive integer k to be the set of all differentiable functions whose derivative is in Ck1. In particular, Ck is contained in Ck1 for every k>0, and there are examples to show that this containment is strict (CkCk1). The class C of infinitely differentiable functions is the intersection of the classes Ck as k varies over the non-negative integers.

Examples

Continuous (C0) but not differentiable

The C0 function f(x) = x for x ≥ 0 and 0 otherwise.
The function g(x) = x2 sin(1/x) for x > 0.
The function f: with f(x)=x2sin(1x) for x0 and f(0)=0 is differentiable. However, this function is not continuously differentiable.
A smooth function that is not analytic.

The function f(x)={xif x0,0if x<0 is continuous, but not differentiable at x = 0, so it is of class C0, but not of class C1.

Finitely differentiable functions

For each even non-negative integer k, the function f(x)=|x|k+1 is continuous and of class Ck. At x = 0, however, f is not of class Ck+1, so f is of class Ck, but not of class Cj where j > k.

Differentiable but not continuously differentiable (not C1)

The function g(x)={x2sin(1x)if x0,0if x=0 is differentiable, with derivative g(x)={cos(1x)+2xsin(1x)if x0,0if x=0.

Because cos(1/x) oscillates as x → 0, g(x) is not continuous at zero. Therefore, g(x) is differentiable but not of class C1.

Differentiable but not Lipschitz continuous

The function h(x)={x4/3sin(1x)if x0,0if x=0 is differentiable, but its derivative is unbounded on every compact interval containing 0. Therefore, h is an example of a differentiable function that is not locally Lipschitz continuous at 0.

Analytic (Cω)

The exponential function ex is analytic, and hence falls into the class Cω. The trigonometric functions are also analytic wherever they are defined, because they are linear combinations of complex exponential functions eix and eix.

Smooth (C) but not analytic (Cω)

The bump function f(x)={e11x2 if |x|<1,0 otherwise  is smooth, so of class C, but it is not analytic at x = ±1, and hence is not of class Cω. The function f is an example of a smooth function with compact support.

Multivariate differentiability classes

A function f:Un defined on an open set U of n is said[3] to be of class Ck on U, for a positive integer k, if all partial derivatives Dαf=|α|fx1α1x2α2xnαn exist and are continuous for every multi-index α=(α1,α2,,αn) of non-negative integers with |α|=α1+α2++αnk. Equivalently, in finite dimensions, f is of class Ck on U if it is k times continuously Fréchet differentiable on U. The function f is said to be of class C or C0 if it is continuous on U. Functions of class C1 are also said to be continuously differentiable.

A function f:Unm, defined on an open set U of n, is said to be of class Ck on U, for a positive integer k, if all of its components fi=πiffor i=1,2,3,,m are of class Ck, where πi are the natural projections πi:m defined by πi(x1,x2,,xm)=xi. It is said to be of class C or C0 if it is continuous, or equivalently, if all components fi are continuous, on U.

Function spaces

Open domains

Let D be an open subset of n. The set of all real-valued Ck functions on D is denoted Ck(D). With the compact-open Ck topology, Ck(D) is a Fréchet space. One way to describe this topology is by the family of seminorms pK,α(f)=supxK|Dαf(x)|, where K ranges over compact subsets of D and α ranges over multi-indices with |α|k.

Compact domains

If Un is bounded and open, then Ck(U) denotes the space of functions on U whose partial derivatives of order at most k extend continuously to the compact set U.[4] It is a Banach space with the norm |f|Ck(U)=max|α|ksupxU|Dαf(x)|. Equivalently, one may use the sum of these suprema over |α|k; the resulting norm is equivalent.

Under pointwise addition and multiplication, Ck(U) is a commutative Banach algebra. The algebra property follows from the Leibniz rule, which expresses each derivative of a product in terms of derivatives of the factors of order at most k.

More generally, if M is a compact smooth manifold, possibly with boundary, then Ck(M) is a Banach space. Its norm may be defined using a finite collection of coordinate charts and a partition of unity; different such choices give equivalent norms. With pointwise multiplication, Ck(M) is again a Banach algebra. By contrast, C(M) is generally not a Banach space; on a compact manifold it is naturally a Fréchet space, with seminorms controlling derivatives of all orders.

The Gelfand spectrum of Ck(M) is M itself. Thus the Gelfand transform gives an injective (but not surjective) map Ck(M)C0(M).[5]:{{{1}}}

Density

The above spaces occur naturally in applications where functions having derivatives of certain orders are necessary; however, particularly in the study of partial differential equations, it can sometimes be more fruitful to work instead with Sobolev spaces.

Smooth compactly supported functions are dense in many function spaces used in analysis, such as Lp spaces and Sobolev spaces under suitable hypotheses. These correspond to putting topologies on the smooth functions that are weaker than those of uniform convergence (like the Lp norm). This makes smooth functions useful as test functions and as approximations to less regular functions.

Basic properties

The differentiability classes Ck are closed under the usual algebraic operations. If f and g are real-valued functions of class Ck on the same domain, then f+g, fg, and any scalar multiple of f are also of class Ck. If g is nowhere zero, then the quotient f/g is of class Ck. These facts follow from the sum, product, and quotient rules for derivatives.[5][6] Moreover, the space Ck(U) is a real vector space and, under pointwise multiplication, a commutative algebra. In particular, C(M), the algebra of smooth real-valued functions on a smooth manifold M, plays a central role in differential geometry: many geometric objects on M can be described in terms of their action on smooth functions.

The class Ck is also closed under composition. If U,V,W are open subsets of Euclidean spaces, f:UV is of class Ck, and g:VW is of class Ck, then the composite map gf:UW is of class Ck. For k=1, this is a consequence of the chain rule: D(gf)(x)=Dg(f(x))Df(x). The higher-order case follows by repeated differentiation.[5][6]

The classes form a nested hierarchy: CCk+1CkC1C0. Thus every Ck+1 function is Ck, and every C1 function is continuous. On typical domains, such as open intervals or open subsets of Euclidean space, these inclusions are strict.

In several variables, continuous differentiability has several consequences for partial derivatives. If a function is of class Ck, then its mixed partial derivatives of order at most k are independent of the order of differentiation. In particular, if f is of class C2, then 2fxixj=2fxjxi for all coordinate directions xi and xj.[6] As a consequence, the hessian matrix of a C2 function is a symmetric matrix.

The class C1 is a hypothesis in local results such as the inverse function theorem and the implicit function theorem. For example, if f:Unn is of class C1 and the derivative Df(a) is invertible at a point aU, then f is locally invertible near a, and its local inverse is also of class C1.[5][6]

Continuity

The terms parametric continuity (Ck) and geometric continuity (Gn) were introduced by Brian Barsky, to show that the smoothness of a curve can be measured either with respect to a particular parametrization or after allowing changes in the speed with which the parameter traces out the curve.[7][8][9]

Parametric continuity

Parametric continuity (Ck) is a concept applied to parametric curves, which describes the smoothness of the curve as a function of its parameter. A (parametric) curve s:[0,1]n is said to be of class Ck if the derivatives of s up to order k exist and are continuous on [0,1], where derivatives at the end-points 0 and 1 are taken to be one-sided derivatives (from the right at 0 and from the left at 1).

As a practical application of this concept, a curve describing the motion of an object with a parameter of time has C1 continuity when its velocity varies continuously, and C2 continuity when its acceleration varies continuously. For smoother motion, such as that of a camera's path while making a film, higher orders of parametric continuity may be required.

Order of parametric continuity

Two Bézier curve segments attached in a way that is only C0 continuous
Two Bézier curve segments attached in such a way that they are C1 continuous

The various orders of parametric continuity can be described as follows:[10]

  • C0: zeroth derivative is continuous (curves are continuous)
  • C1: zeroth and first derivatives are continuous
  • C2: zeroth, first and second derivatives are continuous
  • Cn: 0-th through n-th derivatives are continuous

Geometric continuity

Curves with G1-contact (circles,line)
(1ε2)x22px+y2=0,p>0,ε0
pencil of conic sections with G2-contact: p fix, ε variable
(ε=0: circle,ε=0.8: ellipse, ε=1: parabola, ε=1.2: hyperbola)

A curve or surface can be described as having Gn continuity, with n being an increasing measure of smoothness. Consider the segments on either side of a point on a curve:

  • G0: The curves touch at the join point.
  • G1: The curves also share a common tangent direction at the join point.
  • G2: The curves also share a common center of curvature at the join point.

In general, Gn continuity holds when the curves can be reparameterized so that they have Cn parametric continuity.[11][12] A reparametrization of the curve is geometrically identical to the original; only the parameter is affected.

Equivalently, two vector functions f(t) and g(t) such that f(1)=g(0) have Gn continuity at the point where they meet if they satisfy equations known as Beta-constraints. For example, the Beta-constraints for G4 continuity are:

g(1)(0)=β1f(1)(1)g(2)(0)=β12f(2)(1)+β2f(1)(1)g(3)(0)=β13f(3)(1)+3β1β2f(2)(1)+β3f(1)(1)g(4)(0)=β14f(4)(1)+6β12β2f(3)(1)+(4β1β3+3β22)f(2)(1)+β4f(1)(1)

where β2, β3, and β4 are arbitrary, but β1 is constrained to be positive.[11] In the case n=1, this reduces to f(1)0 and f(1)=kg(0), for a scalar k>0 (i.e., the direction, but not necessarily the magnitude, of the two vectors is equal).

While it may be obvious that a curve would require G1 continuity to appear smooth, for good aesthetics, such as those aspired to in architecture and sports car design, higher levels of geometric continuity are required. For example, class A surface requires G2 or higher continuity to ensure smooth reflections in a car body.

A rounded rectangle (with ninety-degree circular arcs at the four corners) has G1 continuity, but does not have G2 continuity. The same is true for a rounded cube, with octants of a sphere at its corners and quarter-cylinders along its edges. If an editable curve with G2 continuity is required, then cubic splines are typically chosen; these curves are frequently used in industrial design.

Other concepts

Relation to analyticity

While all analytic functions are smooth on the set on which they are analytic, examples such as bump functions (mentioned above) show that the converse is not true for functions on the reals: there exist smooth real functions that are not analytic. Simple examples of functions that are smooth but not analytic at any point can be made by means of Fourier series; another example is the Fabius function. Although it might seem that such functions are the exception rather than the rule, analytic functions form a small subclass of smooth functions; for example, with suitable topologies on spaces of smooth functions, analytic functions form a meagre subset of the smooth functions.[13] Furthermore, for every open subset A of the real line, there exist smooth functions that are analytic on A and nowhere else.[14]

The situation thus described is in marked contrast to complex differentiable functions. If a complex function is holomorphic on an open set, it is infinitely differentiable and analytic on that set.[15]

A theorem of Émile Borel states that every formal power series occurs as the Taylor series of some smooth function. This is another way in which smooth functions differ from analytic functions, whose Taylor series determine them locally.

Smoothness and the Fourier transform

Under suitable hypotheses, higher differentiability of a function is related to faster decay of its Laplace transform or Fourier transform. For example, integration by parts gives decay estimates for Fourier transforms of functions whose derivatives satisfy appropriate integrability or boundary conditions. These relationships are related to results such as the Paley–Wiener theorem.

Conversely, decay of the Fourier transform can imply differentiability or continuity properties of the original function. This is often formulated using Sobolev spaces: Fourier-transform decay gives Sobolev regularity, and the Sobolev embedding theorem gives conditions under which Sobolev regularity implies classical Ck smoothness.

Test functions and distributions

Smooth compactly supported functions, usually denoted Cc(U), are called test functions. They are used to define distributions and weak derivatives.

Smooth partitions of unity

Smooth functions with suitably controlled support, especially smooth functions with compact support, are used in the construction of smooth partitions of unity (see partition of unity and topology glossary); these are essential in the study of smooth manifolds, for example to show that Riemannian metrics can be defined globally starting from their local existence. A simple case is that of a bump function on the real line, that is, a smooth function f that takes the value 0 outside an interval [a,b] and such that f(x)>0 for a<x<b.

Given a locally finite collection of overlapping intervals on the line, bump functions can be constructed on each of them, and on semi-infinite intervals (,c] and [d,+) to cover the whole line, such that the sum of the functions is always 1.

From what has just been said, partitions of unity do not apply to holomorphic functions in the same way; for example, there are no nonzero holomorphic functions with compact support on a connected complex domain. Their different behavior relative to existence and analytic continuation is one of the roots of sheaf theory. In contrast, sheaves of smooth functions are fine and hence have different cohomological behavior.

Smooth functions on and between manifolds

Given a smooth manifold M, of dimension m, and an atlas U={(Uα,ϕα)}α, a map f:M is smooth on M if, for every pM, there is a chart (U,ϕ)U, with pU, such that fϕ1:ϕ(U) is a smooth function from the open subset ϕ(U) of m to . Similarly, f is of class Ck if these coordinate representations are of class Ck. Smoothness can be checked with respect to any chart of the atlas that contains p, since the smoothness requirements on the transition functions between charts ensure that if f is smooth near p in one chart it will be smooth near p in any other chart.

On a smooth manifold M, smooth vector fields can be identified with derivations of the algebra C(M). That is, a vector field X acts on smooth functions by fXf and satisfies the Leibniz rule X(fg)=fX(g)+gX(f).

If F:MN is a map from M to an n-dimensional manifold N, then F is smooth if, for every pM, there is a chart (U,ϕ) containing p, and a chart (V,ψ) containing F(p) such that F(U)V, and ψFϕ1:ϕ(U)ψ(V) is a smooth function between open subsets of Euclidean spaces.

Smooth maps between manifolds induce linear maps between tangent spaces: for F:MN, at each point the pushforward (or differential) maps tangent vectors at p to tangent vectors at F(p): F*,p:TpMTF(p)N, and on the level of the tangent bundle, the pushforward is a vector bundle homomorphism: F*:TMTN. The dual to the pushforward is the pullback, which "pulls" covectors on N back to covectors on M, and k-forms to k-forms: F*:Ωk(N)Ωk(M). In this way smooth functions between manifolds can transport local data, like vector fields and differential forms, from one manifold to another, or down to Euclidean space where computations like integration are well understood.

Preimages and images of smooth maps are, in general, not manifolds without additional assumptions. Preimages of regular values are manifolds; this means that, for a smooth map F:MN and a value qN, the differential dFp:TpMTqN is surjective at every point pF1(q). This is the preimage theorem. Similarly, the image of an embedding is an embedded submanifold.[16]

Smoothness is also defined for sections of vector bundles. A section is smooth if its coordinate components are smooth in local trivializations. Smooth vector fields, differential forms, and tensor fields are examples of smooth sections.

Smooth functions between subsets of manifolds

There is a corresponding notion of smooth map for arbitrary subsets of manifolds. If f:XY is a function whose domain and codomain are subsets of manifolds XM and YN, respectively, then f is said to be smooth if for all xX there is an open set UM with xU and a smooth function F:UN such that F(p)=f(p) for all pUX.

Hölder spaces

For 0<α1, the Hölder spaces Ck,α(U) on an open set U in n are functions that are Ck on U and whose k-th partials satisfy a Hölder condition on U: |kf(x)kf(y)|C|xy|α. This condition is stronger than ordinary continuity. When α=1, it implies the Lipschitz continuity of the k-th derivative, which is weaker than their differentiability. Thus, for 0<α<1, and on a non-empty open domain U, Ck(U)Ck,α(U)Ck,1(U)Ck+1(U).

See also

References

  1. ^ Weisstein, Eric W. "Smooth Function". mathworld.wolfram.com (in الإنجليزية). Archived from the original on 2019-12-16. Retrieved 2019-12-13.
  2. ^ Warner, Frank W. (1983). Foundations of Differentiable Manifolds and Lie Groups. Springer. p. 5 [Definition 1.2]. ISBN 978-0-387-90894-6. Archived from the original on 2015-10-01. Retrieved 2014-11-28.
  3. ^ Henri Cartan (1977). Cours de calcul différentiel. Paris: Hermann.
  4. ^ Evans, Lawrence C. (2010). Partial Differential Equations. Graduate Studies in Mathematics. Vol. 19 (2nd ed.). American Mathematical Society. ISBN 978-0-8218-4974-3.
  5. ^ أ ب ت ث Rudin, Walter (1976). Principles of Mathematical Analysis (3rd ed.). McGraw-Hill. ISBN 978-0-07-054235-8.
  6. ^ أ ب ت ث Munkres, James R. (1991). Analysis on Manifolds. Addison-Wesley. ISBN 978-0-201-51035-5.
  7. ^ Barsky, Brian A. (1981). The Beta-spline: A Local Representation Based on Shape Parameters and Fundamental Geometric Measures (Ph.D.). University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah.
  8. ^ Brian A. Barsky (1988). Computer Graphics and Geometric Modeling Using Beta-splines. Springer-Verlag, Heidelberg. ISBN 978-3-642-72294-3.
  9. ^ Richard H. Bartels; John C. Beatty; Brian A. Barsky (1987). An Introduction to Splines for Use in Computer Graphics and Geometric Modeling. Morgan Kaufmann. Chapter 13. Parametric vs. Geometric Continuity. ISBN 978-1-55860-400-1.
  10. ^ van de Panne, Michiel (1996). "Parametric Curves". Fall 1996 Online Notes. University of Toronto, Canada. Archived from the original on 2020-11-26. Retrieved 2019-09-01.
  11. ^ أ ب Barsky, Brian A.; DeRose, Tony D. (1989). "Geometric Continuity of Parametric Curves: Three Equivalent Characterizations". IEEE Computer Graphics and Applications. 9 (6): 60–68. doi:10.1109/38.41470. S2CID 17893586.
  12. ^ Hartmann, Erich (2003). "Geometry and Algorithms for Computer Aided Design" (PDF). Technische Universität Darmstadt. p. 55. Archived (PDF) from the original on 2020-10-23. Retrieved 2019-08-31.
  13. ^ Darst, R. B. (1973). "Most Infinitely Differentiable Functions are Nowhere Analytic". Canadian Mathematical Bulletin. 16 (4): 597–598. doi:10.4153/CMB-1973-098-3.
  14. ^ Kim, Sung S.; Kwon, Kil H. (2000). "Smooth (C) but Nowhere Analytic Functions". American Mathematical Monthly. 107 (3): 264–266. doi:10.2307/2589322. JSTOR 2589322.
  15. ^ Ahlfors, Lars V. (1979). Complex Analysis (3rd ed.). McGraw-Hill. ISBN 978-0-07-000657-7.
  16. ^ Guillemin, Victor; Pollack, Alan (1974). Differential Topology. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall. ISBN 0-13-212605-2.